Count down to Narrowbanding.
Latest topics
» Thoughts on new Escort IQ?
Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:30 pm by visualestimate

» Bel STi save on rear 35.5
Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:28 pm by visualestimate

» X band falsing
Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:25 pm by visualestimate

» Kustom Pro II Laser speed gun
Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:23 pm by visualestimate

» What CB radio do you use?
Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:22 pm by visualestimate

» Trying out the Garmin 1390LMT GPS
Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:54 am by RemoteInstall

» How exactly does a radar detector block out a TSR Sensor and not real Radar sources at the same time?
Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:49 am by RemoteInstall

» Zaon PCAS MRX
Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:47 am by RemoteInstall

» Had my uniden pc68xl peaked and tweaked yday.
Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:42 am by RemoteInstall

North Carolina Considers Dumping Vehicle Safety Inspections

View previous topic View next topic Go down

North Carolina Considers Dumping Vehicle Safety Inspections

Post by RemoteInstall on Tue Mar 22, 2011 11:36 am

Thursday, March 17, 2011
North Carolina Considers Dumping Vehicle Safety Inspections

Fourteen state senators want to do away with safety inspections for vehicles in the North Carolina. Led by state Senator Stan Bingham (R-Denton), the group introduced Senate Bill 123 last month in response to a 2008 legislative report suggesting the benefit of imposing the $165 million annual burden on motorists has yielded no measurable safety benefit.
Each year, the state's 6.1 million vehicles must be taken to a private station for a $13.60 safety inspection. Vehicles registered in half of the state's counties must also take a $30 emissions test. The state only keeps 85 cents out of the safety inspection fee, with the remainder kept by the inspector who also earns significant revenue by repairing whatever faults he discovers.
The legislative auditors surveyed available data from around the country and concluded that there is no reliable evidence to show that safety inspections reduce accidents. They looked in particular at states that had such programs and later dropped them. Nebraska's three-year average number of crashes with inspections in place was 1759. After inspections were dumped in 1982, the three-year average dropped to 1486. In North Carolina, vehicle defects only accounted for the cause of one percent of accidents.
The reliability of the tests is also open to question. Pennsylvania officials took a vehicle with thirteen defects to twenty inspection stations. Most found only flagged seven problems, while some stations invented non-existent defects. In North Carolina, 97.7 percent of tested vehicles passed. Cars between ten and thirty years old failed more often, but they comprised a small portion of the state's vehicles. The reasons cited for failure most often were defective tires, burned out stop lights, inadequate windshield wipers. A total of 30,238 people were failed because of a burned out license plate light. The auditors found this result did not justify the hassles involved.
"In addition to the price of the inspection, motorists also incur other costs associated with getting an inspection," the report stated. "Travel time, wait time, and time away from work or other activities are costs incurred by individuals who must get a vehicle inspection. The Program Evaluation Division estimates the indirect costs associated with getting an emissions inspection are approximately $21 million."
Although the air quality in North Carolina has been improving, the auditors had no way to link the improvement to the emissions testing program. Because federal rules handed down by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) govern the operation of the emissions inspection program, state lawmakers are not entirely free to drop the program without first obtaining EPA approval of their plans. The legislative auditors recommended that at least newer vehicles be exempted from the annual hassle.
"Program Evaluation Division analysis shows newer vehicles are less likely to fail emissions inspections," the report stated. "Analysis also shows exempting vehicles from the three newest model years does not affect the overall failure rate for the state. By exempting vehicles from the three newest model years, the state would relieve the annual emissions requirement for 19 percent of vehicles."

RemoteInstall-

RemoteInstall
Site Administrator
Site Administrator

Posts: 417
Join date: 2010-09-11
Age: 28
Location: Allentown PA

http://www.traptactics.com/forum

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum